<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Smart Internet Marketing at Guruphobia</title>
	<link>http://www.guruphobia.com</link>
	<description>Be Your Own Smart Internet Marketing Guru</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Every Marketer Wants to Be a Guru</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/29/every-marketer-wants-to-be-a-guru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/29/every-marketer-wants-to-be-a-guru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2007 17:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gurus Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/29/every-marketer-wants-to-be-a-guru/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every Marketer Wants to Be a Guru.
What a sweeping statement, by one of the most well-known Gurus around.
And one that I disagree with vehemently.
You see, Mr. Guru, not everyone WANTS to be you, or WANTS to be like you. 
Sorry.
There are marketers who are just happily motoring along, making very good money, staying in the shadows, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every Marketer Wants to Be a Guru.</p>
<p>What a sweeping statement, by one of the most well-known Gurus around.</p>
<p>And one that I disagree with vehemently.</p>
<p>You see, Mr. Guru, not everyone WANTS to be you, or WANTS to be like you. </p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
<p>There are marketers who are just happily motoring along, making very good money, staying in the shadows, unbeknownst to the general marketing population at large.</p>
<p>How do I know?  Because I know several personally.</p>
<p>These marketers don&#8217;t need throngs of adoring fans hanging on their every word.  They don&#8217;t need to be the center of attention.</p>
<p>And what about you, Mr. P?  Isn&#8217;t that like the pot calling the kettle black?</p>
<p>Not at all.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t need to be &#8220;known&#8221;.  My main purpose is to vent a bit, or a lot&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..and in the process, perhaps give back a little to the community.</p>
<p>After all, how many of my products have you seen me sell on this site?  How many affiliate links have you seen me post thus far?</p>
<p>So consider that for a minute, before someone tells you, &#8220;Every Marketer Wants to be a Guru&#8221;.</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/29/every-marketer-wants-to-be-a-guru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Buying for Bonuses</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/28/buying-for-bonuses/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/28/buying-for-bonuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gurus Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/28/buying-for-bonuses/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever come across a situation, where a guru promises a fantastic bonus for buying through his/her affiliate link?
And you take the bait, buying the product?
I have, and I&#8217;m sure so have you.  Now I think many of us can understand when gurus are foisting &#8220;worthless&#8221; e-book bonuses our way - you know, the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever come across a situation, where a guru promises a fantastic bonus for buying through his/her affiliate link?</p>
<p>And you take the bait, buying the product?</p>
<p>I have, and I&#8217;m sure so have you.  Now I think many of us can understand when gurus are foisting &#8220;worthless&#8221; e-book bonuses our way - you know, the ones that you&#8217;ve seen percolating through the net since 1972?</p>
<p>What really burns my hide, though, are the other bonuses, many from big name gurus who should really know better.</p>
<ul>
<li>The One on One Consultation Bonus - I&#8217;ll admit, I&#8217;ve been burned by this one twice before.  Guru A promises a &#8220;one-on-one personal consultation&#8221; with me - in one case, said Guru promised to record the call on Skype and send me a copy, so that I could reference it for posterity.  My posterior.  In one case, Guru A simply failed to respond once my payment for the product went through.  In the other case, Guru B was clearly overwhelmed by the response, and &#8220;amended&#8221; the bonus after everyone had purchased to a &#8220;group teleconference&#8221;.  Shame on you.  Mind you, these were &#8220;top shelf&#8221; gurus, too.</li>
<li>The &#8220;Free Advertising Bonus&#8221; - Guru C offers free advertising on his niche publications, that go out to lists in the &#8220;several hundred thousands&#8221;.  Problem is, when said Guru C is contacted for the ad, he conveniently disappears.</li>
</ul>
<p>The lesson here?  Never buy on the basis of a bonus.  If you must buy a product, buy it because it is fundamentally sound and well-reviewed by people you TRUST.  You&#8217;ll save yourself much disappointment.</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/05/28/buying-for-bonuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wherefore Art Thou?</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/04/26/wherefore-art-thou/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/04/26/wherefore-art-thou/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 04:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The Newbie Dance]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, well&#8230;&#8230;.
I guess it&#8217;s been a while since my last discourse, hasn&#8217;t it?
Well, I&#8217;ve been busy&#8230;&#8230;busy reading, busy working, and busy playing.
I&#8217;ve spent some nice recharge time on Sunset Beach and Mokuleia on Oahu (vacations aren&#8217;t over-rated).  They inspire some of my most creative endeavors.
The entrepreneurial world can be at times maddening, but when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, well&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>I guess it&#8217;s been a while since my last discourse, hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;ve been busy&#8230;&#8230;busy reading, busy working, and busy playing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spent some nice recharge time on Sunset Beach and Mokuleia on Oahu (vacations aren&#8217;t over-rated).  They inspire some of my most creative endeavors.</p>
<p>The entrepreneurial world can be at times maddening, but when the celestial planets line up, the payoff can be extreme.</p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not getting existential on you.</p>
<p>Just trying to prod you.  Get busy living.</p>
<p>Stop to smell the roses, but don&#8217;t get stuck in the mud.</p>
<p>Make time to love the significants in your life.</p>
<p>And ask yourself this question:</p>
<p>What have I done to make the planets align for me today?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Mr. P</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2007/04/26/wherefore-art-thou/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remembering Milton Friedman</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/11/16/remembering-milton-friedman/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/11/16/remembering-milton-friedman/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 19:47:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[The World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many of you reading this blog won&#8217;t even know who Milton Friedman was.
Mr. Friedman was an influential economist, a leader of the &#8220;Chicago School&#8221; of economics.  He championed Free Market Economics and deregulation, and his theories and teachings helped shape American Economics and Economic policy in the late 20th Century.  He even won [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you reading this blog won&#8217;t even know who Milton Friedman was.</p>
<p>Mr. Friedman was an influential economist, a leader of the &#8220;Chicago School&#8221; of economics.  He championed Free Market Economics and deregulation, and his theories and teachings helped shape American Economics and Economic policy in the late 20th Century.  He even won a Nobel Prize in 1976.</p>
<p>However, as with any Economist, he was adored in some corners and chastised in others.  He had his successes and his utter failures whilst advising many Presidents.</p>
<p>Many saw Friedman as a political right-leaner.  However, while he served as an advisor to numerous Republican Presidents, his views were much more Libertarian.  He served on a panel that helped abolish the draft in the 1970s.  He questioned the U.S.&#8217;s involvement in the first Gulf War, and vehemently opposed our current Iraq war.</p>
<p>I first met Milton Friedman in a seminar almost 20 years ago when I was still in my University years.  I found him articulate, compelling, gracious, and very funny.  After the seminar, I approached him, shook his hand, and asked him to sign a dollar bill for me.</p>
<p>&#8220;Isn&#8217;t this defacement of currency?&#8221; he asked me, his dry wit emerging.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don&#8217;t worry&#8230;..this dollar will never return into circulation again&#8221;, I answered.</p>
<p>Milton Friedman shaped my views on Economics, Fiscal Policy, and Politics for years to come.</p>
<p>Years later, my home was burglarized, and much of my cash and valuables were stolen.  After surveying my missing belongings, I noticed that my &#8220;Friedman Dollar&#8221;, which had been encased in a protective plastic sleeve, was missing.  Out of everything that was stolen, the loss of that Dollar hurt me the most.</p>
<p>I just read that Milton Friedman passed away today in San Francisco at the age of 94.</p>
<p>He might have been a small man in stature, but he was a giant in his field, and I will greatly miss him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/11/16/remembering-milton-friedman/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duplicate Content - My Take on the Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/10/02/duplicate-content-my-take-on-the-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/10/02/duplicate-content-my-take-on-the-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 18:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[SEO - Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Duplicate content seems to be a major issue confronting site builders these days.
Duplicate content.  Is Google penalizing duplicate content or not?  Based on my experience, and some experienced SEO experts I&#8217;ve talked to, the answer is a qualified yes.  Admittedly, there is still tons of top ranking duplicate content in the Google index, but there [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Duplicate content seems to be a major issue confronting site builders these days.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Duplicate content.  Is Google penalizing duplicate content or not?  Based on my experience, and some experienced SEO experts I&#8217;ve talked to, the answer is a qualified yes.  Admittedly, there is still tons of top ranking duplicate content in the Google index, but there are also growing examples that Google is cracking down on this as best they can.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">There is a &#8220;shingle theory&#8221; that is much discussed, in that Google looks at 12 to 15-word segments or &#8220;shingles&#8221; to determine duplicate content status.  The theory goes that Google has determined that it is almost mathematically impossible for two articles to have the same 12 to 15-word &#8220;shingle&#8221; without being the same article.  So which article wins?  The article on the page with the highest PR wins, according to some SEO experts I&#8217;ve talked to.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">How does this impact you now?  It may not impact you at all right now, depending on the niche your site is in.  However, if you are republishing public domain articles or content, republishing PLR (Private Label Rights) content without alterations, republishing snippets of unaltered content, or republishing unaltered datafeeds on your site, you should reassess your site publishing strategy, because the Search Engines will eventually catch up to you someday.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">The &#8220;anti-Duplicate Content&#8221; contingent argues that Google doesn&#8217;t have NEARLY the computing power necessary to sift through BILLIONS of websites to go searching for 15-word &#8220;shingles&#8221;.  And they would be partially right too.  Google doesn&#8217;t have the computing power necessary to compare ALL sites.  However, my argument is that they don&#8217;t have to.  Google is getting increasingly better at theming sites - why not just compare sites that exist within a similar theme?  This drastically reduces the number of sites for comparison and then allows for significantly easier &#8220;shingle&#8221; comparison.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">How does Google know which themes to focus on?  Well, it stands to reason that the most competitive niches likely have the most duplicate content.  See that Google Toolbar at the top of your web brower?  That&#8217;s one way.  The other way is for them to simply scan Google Adwords activity on their own site, looking for the most paid ads and bid levels.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Some site builders aren&#8217;t even concerned about Google, but are focused on Yahoo and MSN.  However, it doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to determine that Yahoo and MSN are probably developing duplicate content filters of their own as well.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">So, young site builders, go forth and create, but do so carefully, and with an eye firmly fixed toward the future.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">Mr. P</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-fareast-font-family: SimSun; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/10/02/duplicate-content-my-take-on-the-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Truth Hurts, Doesn’t It, Guru?</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/12/the-truth-hurts-doesn%e2%80%99t-it-guru/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/12/the-truth-hurts-doesn%e2%80%99t-it-guru/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 04:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gurus Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#8217;t know what it is about the e-mails I&#8217;m getting lately that are irritating the hell out of me.
A few days ago I got another classic - here&#8217;s a summary:
1) Guru feels badly about sending so many e-mails to his list.
2) Guru says that he is not doing this for the money.
3) Guru says [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">I don&#8217;t know what it is about the e-mails I&#8217;m getting lately that are irritating the hell out of me.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">A few days ago I got another classic - here&#8217;s a summary:</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">1) Guru feels badly about sending so many e-mails to his list.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">2) Guru says that he is not doing this for the money.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">3) Guru says he is only doing this to HELP people SUCCEED.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Mr. P&#8217;s response:</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">1) You feel badly because you DO send too many e-mails.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">2) You damn well are doing it for the money.  If your intentions truly are as PURE as you claim, why not resolve to NOT include any affiliate links or referrals to JV partner offers for a period of at least one month.  You can&#8217;t do it, can you?  It is intrinsically and diametrically opposed to your true nature, isn&#8217;t it, Guru?</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">3) You should see #2 above.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Thanks for cluttering my inbox with your inane reasoning, and your pathetically insincere platitudes, Guru.  Your e-mails have earned an esteemed place in my permanent round file (which goes by the name of &#8220;trash&#8221;.</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Buh-bye……………</font></p>
<p><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">Mr. P</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3">P.S. Pathetically, in this e-mail, the Guru, after explaining his purest of intentions, did INDEED include a link to yet another JV partner offer.  I rest my case.</font></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt"><font face="Times New Roman" size="3" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/12/the-truth-hurts-doesn%e2%80%99t-it-guru/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your E-Mail Desperation is Showing</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/09/your-e-mail-desperation-is-showing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/09/your-e-mail-desperation-is-showing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 05:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gurus Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=12</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About 6 months ago I signed up for the mailing list of a young man who appeared to have fairly unique content, and a bit of a contrarian approach to list building and marketing.
However, somewhere along the line, things changed.  He started sending out e-mail pitches for various products.  Ok, it was enough of a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About 6 months ago I signed up for the mailing list of a young man who appeared to have fairly unique content, and a bit of a contrarian approach to list building and marketing.</p>
<p>However, somewhere along the line, things changed.  He started sending out e-mail pitches for various products.  Ok, it was enough of a pitch increase that I noticed.</p>
<p>Then in the last few weeks, the e-mails became more urgent.  I started noticing that he would sometimes e-mail twice a day.</p>
<p>Finally, a couple weeks ago, he began promoting a teleseminar to his list.  Apparently the teleseminar sign-ups must have not been panning out too well.  Why?  Well, because in a span of 6 hours, I received 5 e-mails&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.each one with what appeared to be a rising, but barely disguised desperation level.  3 of the e-mails came within 30 minutes of the seminar.</p>
<p>Enough was enough&#8230;&#8230;instead of signing up for the seminar, I unsubscribed from his list.  I don&#8217;t appreciate the pummeling - especially in so short a time period.  If you don&#8217;t respect my time, I won&#8217;t respect your offers.</p>
<p>Its too bad too, because I buy thousands of dollars worth of marketing products a year, and some were referred by you, thus earning you fat affiliate payments.  I rarely unsubscribe from interesting lists - I&#8217;ve been on some lists for over 7 YEARS, happily buying commisionable products that seem interesting to me.</p>
<p>BUT, I&#8217;m a busy man.  Don&#8217;t waste my time with your e-mail pummeling.  Time is my most precious commodity.  And time-wasters piss me off to no end and cause my wallet to slam shut tighter than a clam.</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/09/09/your-e-mail-desperation-is-showing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adwords Fallout and Interesting Side Effects</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/08/17/adwords-fallout-and-interesting-side-effects-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/08/17/adwords-fallout-and-interesting-side-effects-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Boy, it sure has quieted down since Google made their adwords changes, hasn&#8217;t it?
To be sure, numerous Adwords Advertisers have been impacted by the new quality score issue, and still are as of this writing.  I personally know of at least 5 serious Adword advertisers who spend a high 5-figure amount per month who have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, it sure has quieted down since Google made their adwords changes, hasn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>To be sure, numerous Adwords Advertisers have been impacted by the new quality score issue, and still are as of this writing.  I personally know of at least 5 serious Adword advertisers who spend a high 5-figure amount per month who have been adversely affected by these changes - they are still scrambling to &#8220;fix&#8221; their landing pages.</p>
<p>This whole episode has spun off some interesting side effects:</p>
<p>- Many are recrafting their sites to better &#8220;comply&#8221; with Google&#8217;s Quality score.  From what I&#8217;ve seen, there are varying levels of success in this approach. </p>
<p>- Many are recrafting AND moving their sites to new domains.  This definitely had short-term success in many instances, but it doesn&#8217;t answer the fundamental question: &#8220;How long before Google&#8217;s Adwords Spider visits your site and scores it for quality again?&#8221;</p>
<p>- A small burgeoning business of crafty entrepreneurs selling &#8220;Beat Google Adwords Quality Score&#8221;-type E-books have sprung up.  In addition, there have also been a new flock of Adwords pseudo-gurus springing up with reports, guides and forums&#8230;&#8230;promising to &#8220;unlock&#8221; the secrets of the mystical &#8220;quality score&#8221; elixir.</p>
<p>- MSN Adcenter and Yahoo PPC have been reaping the benefits as PPC advertisers FLOCK over to them en masse.  This is one effect that could well bite Google in the nether regions long term&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.people who once had no intention of straying from &#8220;Mother Google&#8221; are now risking life and limb to taste the benefits of alternative PPC.  I&#8217;ve personally been finding that while MSN delivers significantly less traffic, the QUALITY of their clicks is much higher.</p>
<p>- Some are quitting PPC altogether.  Their dreams of &#8220;Google riches&#8221; dashed, some are flocking to the next big thing or next big tool.  Adios, amigos&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;and don&#8217;t let the door whack you in the ass on the way out.  Less competition is just fine by me.</p>
<p>Veterans in the PPC game are far too familiar with the fact that algorithm or major &#8220;rule&#8221; shifts occur at least twice a year at Google. </p>
<p>The best and strongest players in PPC plan for this, and adjust accordingly.</p>
<p>And the best and strongest players in the Marketing game have long since diversified accordingly, so factors like a policy or algorithm shift in PPC don&#8217;t decimate their holdings.</p>
<p>Which camp are you in?</p>
<p>Ciao for now,</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/08/17/adwords-fallout-and-interesting-side-effects-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Defines Quality Landing Pages for Adwords - Sort of&#8230;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/11/google-defines-quality-landing-pages-for-adwords-sort-of/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/11/google-defines-quality-landing-pages-for-adwords-sort-of/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 06:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Pay Per Click Marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=9</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has started rolling out revisions to its Adwords PPC service - today, the results have been widely seen.
Here&#8217;s a quote from the Inside Adwords blog at Google:
&#8220;From time-to-time, we improve our algorithms for evaluating landing page quality (often based on feedback from our end-users), and next week we&#8217;re launching another such improvement. Thus, over [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has started rolling out revisions to its Adwords PPC service - today, the results have been widely seen.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a quote from the Inside Adwords blog at Google:</p>
<p>&#8220;From time-to-time, we improve our algorithms for evaluating landing page quality (often based on feedback from our end-users), and next week we&#8217;re launching another such improvement. Thus, over the coming days a small number of advertisers who are providing a low quality user experience on their landing pages will see increases in their minimum bids. It is important to note, however, that the vast majority of advertisers will not be affected at all by this change, as they link to quality landing pages.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus far, the changes have meant unmitigated disaster for many Adwords users. </p>
<p>Instead of a &#8220;small number of advertisers&#8221; seeing minimum bid increases, the reports of horrific bid increases are being WIDELY reported.  In many cases, where minimum bids were previously 15- to 30-cents, Google is now asking for minimum bids of $1.00 to $10.  Reports of $5 and $10 minimum bids are now increasingly common.</p>
<p>Instead of eliminating &#8220;junk&#8221; landing pages, Google appears to have effectively priced out volumes of regular high-quality landing pages and even regular merchant pages.</p>
<p>Early media reports have Google trying to end the practice of &#8220;Adwords Arbitrage&#8221; - the act of using Adwords to drive traffic to landing pages populated with Adsense Ads, in order to profit off the price and revenue differential in certain niches.  At best, these media reports are incorrect and short-sighted.  All one has to do is spend time at major sites like Webmaster World or Digitalpoint Forums to get a clearer idea of how wide a crater Google has created.</p>
<p>So have the &#8220;junk&#8221; sites been eliminated from Adwords Ads?  All one need do is type in the term &#8220;mortgage calculator&#8221; in Google and see the results that come up.  As of this writing, some of the top Adwords results are for MFA (Made for Adsense) Sites, or paid search engine listings - the very type of sites that Google was trying to eliminate.</p>
<p>After making calls to Google Customer Service, it also became clear that Google had given little to no warning to their reps about this week&#8217;s upcoming changes - answers range from complete bewilderment, to the typical &#8220;canned&#8221; answers read or copied from old scripts.</p>
<p>So, what is an Adwords Advertiser to do?  First off, don&#8217;t panic.  Second, don&#8217;t make any radical changes to your campaigns over the next several days at least.  In the past, Google has rolled out major Adwords Changes, only to roll them back or retune them significantly.  Also, don&#8217;t bother calling Google Customer Service over the next couple of days at least - it is clear that there is a major communication disconnect going on internally at Google - calling them now will most likely get you nowhere, and will likely only increase your blood pressure.</p>
<p>Take the next few days and monitor what is going on at the major forums.  Will your campaigns take a hit?  Most probably.  But making rash changes now could further damage your long term income.</p>
<p>Spend some time investigating the alternative PPC networks, Yahoo/Overture and MSN Adcenter.</p>
<p>Lastly, take this time to take stock of your business.  If PPC is your sole means of revenue, you need a reality check.  Putting all of your eggs in one PPC basket is NOT SMART.  Diversify your income sources outside of PPC, so that if one area of your business takes a hit, it does not bring the roof collapsing down around you.</p>
<p>You are diversified, aren&#8217;t you???</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/11/google-defines-quality-landing-pages-for-adwords-sort-of/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Make Money From Blogs?  Or Not?</title>
		<link>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/05/make-money-from-blogs-or-not/</link>
		<comments>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/05/make-money-from-blogs-or-not/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Jul 2006 22:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mr. P</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Gurus Behaving Badly]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.guruphobia.com/?p=8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve noticed yet another interesting trend as of late.
There are dozens of blogs covering the subject of &#8220;How to Make Money From Blogs&#8221;.  They teach techniques on how to monetize your blog, how to gain readership, how to engage your blog audience, and so on, and so on, and so on.
However, only a pitiful few [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve noticed yet another interesting trend as of late.</p>
<p>There are dozens of blogs covering the subject of &#8220;How to Make Money From Blogs&#8221;.  They teach techniques on how to monetize your blog, how to gain readership, how to engage your blog audience, and so on, and so on, and so on.</p>
<p>However, only a pitiful few ever live up to their promise.  And yes - there is a smell-test issue that is arising here.</p>
<p>The incredible irony is that many of these blogs have been ABANDONED for several months to over half a year (yes, I&#8217;ve been monitoring some of them).  A paltry few return after an extended absence, with no explanation whatsoever, while others never ever return.</p>
<p>Hmmmmm……if blogging is so profitable, then WHY aren&#8217;t these Blogging Gurus following their own advice and BLOGGING?</p>
<p>My conclusion is: These Gurus&#8217; blogging models aren&#8217;t that profitable at all…….otherwise, why stop?</p>
<p>Now don&#8217;t get me wrong - blogging can be profitable - evidence the recent sale of blog networks for hefty 6-figure sales.  But I&#8217;m not talking about them.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m talking about the self-appointed Blog Profiteers.</p>
<p>Granted, sometimes shit happens.</p>
<p>Personal tragedy strikes, life&#8217;s priorities interrupt, and sometimes there are other emergencies that intrude upon one&#8217;s life.</p>
<p>However, if you are TRULY following your own advice, and engaging your audience, then you certainly owe them a brief explanation for your absence, don&#8217;t you?  Especially if you are going to be stepping back from the blog console for months at a time.</p>
<p>Otherwise, people might just draw the wrong conclusion - about your personal blog profit model teachings, about the effectiveness of your methods, or……..about you.</p>
<p>Mr. P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.guruphobia.com/2006/07/05/make-money-from-blogs-or-not/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
